As I watched my students enter the classroom today I was more
aware of their reactions than usual. Their eyes were big with excitement, they
took their seats unusually quick and phrases like, “Yes! We have the computers
today!” were abundant. They knew we were doing an “Adopt-An-Element” project
and although they were unsure of the specifics they were inclined to believe it
was going to be fun. As my class
diligently looked up their Element’s group name, atomic number, and other
various information I circled the room noticing how engaged every student
was. Most of the information for their
element could be found on the Periodic Table hanging on the wall, but the lure
of interacting with a virtual diagram was more enticing. Throughout the class
period I was called to numerous students who wanted to show me the website they
found comparing the cost per gram of each Element or tell me the interesting
fact about Chlorine they just learned. Somehow teaching the same material but
utilizing technology has just made the content more interesting. Today’s
students are constantly “plugged-in” to technology. Instead of grabbing a
textbook to learn how to divide fractions, they search for a You-Tube video. We
as educators must embrace the technology craze or I fear we’re fighting an
up-hill battle. (Check out what these
students had to say about using “Cloud-Based” learning) Teachers and schools should
incorporate modern technology into their everyday curriculum.
While reading Hirsch’s “Cultural Literacy in Schools” it is
clear he believes in a two part approach to curriculum. First, is the
implementation of an extensive curriculum consisting of, “traditional
literature knowledge, the information, attitudes and assumptions that literate
Americans share—cultural literacy.” In
other words, students should have knowledge of words and worlds. Hirsch gives the example of reading Dwight D.
Eisenhower’s Farewell Address; to fully understand it we must know “the
historical circumstances that gave rise to it, they have to know who Eisenhower
was and what a farewell address is in the American Tradition” (pg. 127). Hirsch
is implying that in order to fully understand content students must acquire
more detailed information, read deeper literacy and connect to past practices.
However, students growing up in the 21st century are exposed to more
technology than their parents, grandparents or even older siblings. Thus the
“cultural literacy” has changed. Schools should be incorporating technology
daily into their student’s lives, as it has become an ever-changing and fast
growing field. Students need “knowledge
of words and worlds” associated with technology and its uses. Hirsch’s second pieced of the puzzle is an
intensive curriculum which “encourages a fully developed understanding of a
subject, making one’s knowledge of it integrated and coherent” (pg. 128). Hirsch
explains that students should be fully engaged in material and build upon their
experiences. Hirsch ends his article with a plea for educationists to join
forces and combine practices of teaching traditional content and higher order
skills.
In the article “Learning by Playing: Video Games in the
Classroom,” Sara Corbett describes the everyday life of a student attending
Quest to Learn, a non-charter public school in New York City. At Quest to Learn
students play and design video games, blog, film and edit videos and record
podcasts. Here educators have taken steps to, “stop looking so critically at
the way children use media and start exploring how that energy might best be
harnessed to help drive them academically.” Reflecting on Hirsch’s two-part
curriculum, I believe he would not be completely in favor of this modernized
curriculum. However, Hirsh does explain a need for educators to combine methods
of teaching traditional academia and higher order thinking skills.
Although very different, both of these articles contain some
common threads. Students need to be deeply engaged and interested to learn
specific content. Also, students should be culturally literate and exposed to
higher order thinking skills. I believe this can be achieved by effectively
utilizing technology and this “must happen across the curriculum in ways that
research shows deepen and enhance the learning process.” In, the article Why Integrate Technology into theCurriculum?: The Reasons are Many writers state that “properly used, technology will help students acquire the
skills they need to survive in a complex, highly technological knowledge-based
economy.”
Additional Resources- Technology Integration:What Experts Say
http://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-experts
http://www.edutopia.org/technology-integration-experts
Hi Jamie,
ReplyDeleteThanks for your work here. This is a very nicely crafted post!
I like how you started with an anecdote, one that makes me hopeful. Anytime kids get excited, we are on to something good! It's so interesting that traditional content, readily available through other mediums (element chart!), becomes interesting when some type of electronic medium is involved.
What do you think is going on here? Is this just a novelty effect, that would wear off after doing it for a while? Or is there something else going on? Is it the fact that kids start to get the feeling of going out to discover something that excites them? Maybe this means we should stop presenting information, and do more with kids locating and evaluating it on their own?
I do think you are right we face an up-hill battle if we don't embrace social uses of technology more. We risk becoming the most out-of-date institution, still making kids carry around heavy books, when the rest of the world is on their kindle. At some point, I think we start to risk losing all credibility with kids if we refuse to adapt.
(As a side point, I think it's interesting how schools and teachers are faulted when we don't hold up "traditional" values which the rest of society has long since stopped paying attention to.)
You have a nice way with your turn of phrase: knowledge of word and world. It reminds me of Freire's work on literacy: reading the world comes before reading the word. We need to teach kids to interpret the world around them in order for those words on a page to become more than empty symbols. I know Hirsch doesn't buy that, but I think I do. And our world changes--is changing--fast. In that way, any curriculum based on cultural literacy needs to pay as much attention to the present and future as it does the past. That is where I think Hirsch is short-sighted, and Q2L might have more to teach us.
Thanks for your post!
Kyle